Last Updated:
Shashi Tharoor admitted he was wrong in opposing India’s stance on the Russia-Ukraine war, now believing India’s policy positions it to influence lasting peace

The Congress MP said the policy adopted by India following the outbreak of the conflict meant that the country has actually a prime minister who can hug both the president of Ukraine and the president in Moscow two weeks apart and be accepted in both places. (File photo)
Congress leader Shashi Tharoor Tuesday said he was left with an egg on his face in opposing India’s stance when the Russia-Ukraine war broke out and said due to the policy that was adopted, the country is now in a position where it can make a difference for lasting peace.
Tharoor criticized India’s position when Russia invaded Ukraine, calling for a condemnation of the aggression. The Congress MP pointed out that India’s approach to the conflict allowed the country to have a prime minister who could visit both the Ukrainian and Russian presidents two weeks apart and be welcomed in both capitals.
During an interactive session at the Raisina Dialogue in New Delhi, the former Minister of State for External Affairs admitted, “I am still wiping the egg off my face because I was one of the few in the parliamentary debate who criticised India’s position back in February 2022.”
The Thiruvananthapuram MP explained that his criticism was based on well-established principles, such as the violation of the UN charter, the principle of inviolability of borders, and Ukraine’s sovereignty. He emphasised that India had historically opposed the use of force to resolve international disputes, and all these principles were breached by one party, which should have been condemned.
Three years later, Tharoor acknowledged that the policy now seems to have been validated, as India’s prime minister was able to maintain good relations with both the Ukrainian and Russian leaders.
Tharoor added that India is in a unique position to influence lasting peace, given its global standing and its geographical distance from Europe. He mentioned that while he couldn’t speak for the government as an opposition member, if a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine were to emerge, India might be open to sending peacekeepers.
He noted that since Russia had rejected European peacekeepers from NATO countries, other nations, like India, could play a role. “Speaking as an Indian parliamentarian, I don’t think there would be significant resistance to that idea,” Tharoor stated, recalling the opposition in 2003 when India was asked to send troops to Iraq after the American invasion.
Tharoor clarified that he didn’t foresee similar resistance for Ukraine, and if peace were reached, India might consider contributing peacekeepers. He also highlighted India’s long-standing commitment to global stability, citing the country’s participation in over 49 peacekeeping missions.
BJP Attacks Congress
Attacking Congress, BJP IT cell head Amit Malviya hit out at Rahul Gandhi and said, “This will likely leave Rahul Gandhi red faced, with the Congress media department scrambling to clarify that Shashi Tharoor’s remarks reflect his personal views—not the party’s official stance—despite Tharoor having led the party’s charge on the issue in Parliament.”
“Congress leader Shashi Tharoor has admitted he was wrong in opposing India’s neutral stance on the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022. He acknowledged that India’s diplomatic balance has given Prime Minister Narendra Modi the unique position of being able to engage with both Ukraine and Russia without hostility,” he added.
This will likely leave Rahul Gandhi red faced, with the Congress media department scrambling to clarify that Shashi Tharoor’s remarks reflect his personal views—not the party’s official stance—despite Tharoor having led the party’s charge on the issue in Parliament.Congress… pic.twitter.com/zrU7xb5TYx
— Amit Malviya (@amitmalviya) March 19, 2025
“Tharoor remarked, ‘Three years later, it does look like I’m the one with egg on my face’, conceding that India’s position has allowed Modi to embrace both the Ukrainian and Russian presidents within weeks. He noted that India’s geographical distance from the conflict and lack of direct stakes in territorial shifts contributed to the success of its neutral approach,” Malviya wrote on X.